Monday, November 30, 2009

American Traffic Calming / Vietnamese Yielding

I went to Ho Chi Min City in April of 2007. 



I was only there a few days, but I had a terrible fever the entire time.  I got it on the plane entering the country and it abated as I flew away.  I'll admit, I didn't really see things clearly on the trip.  It was quite hot, but I never stopped shivering.  Horrible time really.

I've talked to dozens of people who have been to Saigon and they all say the same thing.  They were terrified of the traffic.



Every single person says the same thing.  They didn't know how to cross the street.  It was too scary and they were trapped.  I must admit, I felt the same way at first.  The parade of motorbikes never stops.  24 hours a day, they just keep cruising by.






It is normal to see a family of five on a single motor bike.  The whole scene is decidedly terrifying to the average pedestrian.  Traffic is similar throughout most of Southeast Asia, but Vietnam seems to be the only place without a single car on the street.  Everyone prefers motorbikes.

The first taxi we rode in did a U-turn in the middle of the street and magically parted the sea of motorbikes without any trouble. 

After walking around a while, I noticed that virtually every motorbike that went past me had a rider that was smiling, waving, and looking at me.  Crossing the street wasn't a problem at all.   All I had to do was walk straight across and send no mixed signals.  The motorbikes would just go right past me.  The fumes and noise make the street seem crazy, but the bikes go less than 5 miles per hour.  People would just stop in the middle of the road to say hello to me.  Everyone casually yielded to everyone else.

Ho Chi Min City has the calmest traffic I've ever experienced.  I crossed the streets many times and never had the slightest trouble. 

Walking with a local, I even discovered a rule of etiquette.  I was told not to walk behind her but next to her.  Our group of five lined up and crossed the street not as a mass but as a single point.  Otherwise traffic stopped and bunched up. 


I've never been anywhere with such kind people.  I got a very strong impression that the commuters clogging the streets had nowhere in particular to go.  They were just out cruising for the fun of it.

I was with some friends so I didn't get to take a cyclo.



It seemed like these foot propelled vehicles fit in perfectly with the other bikes on the road. 




I went on a trip while I was there.  We rented a taxi for the day.  I was still very feverish, but our Vietnamese friend was quite motion sick.  She told us that Vietnamese people do not like to be in cars.  The whole population suffers from motion sickness in confined spaces.  Our driver didn't seem to have any problems. 

Perhaps a fear of motion sickness could account for the lack of cars on the road. 

On our trip out of town to a historic Vietcong prison camp in a mangrove swamp we proved to be the only car on the road.
We got out to admire some monkeys and bikes stopped to admire us. 



We later took a ferry and we were the only car on that too.



I've been to a lot of places, and I've never met so many courteous bikers in one place before. 

Perhaps it was just the first time I ever experienced 3rd world traffic, but it still seems the most incredible to me.  In most of Southeast Asia, you can flag down any passing motorbike and offer the rider money to take you wherever you want to go.  You just hop on the back.  Its a great system. 

Saigon was the kindest city that I was in, but there are many close seconds.  Mario, my becak driver in Yogyakarta, Indonesia will always be in my thoughts.



That's him in front of the lava-ravaged Water Temple.  The traffic in Yogyakarta was wonderfully chaotic as well.  I walked with the chickens and the motorbikes just went on by at a calm and happy speed.

In Cambodia, the drivers were a bit more hawkish, but quite nice once employed. 



This was us at a 'gas station' near Siam Reap.  Our driver was very kind there as well.  It took two bottles to fill up the tank.  We paid. 



I know motorbikes are horribly dirty, but they seem so much more friendly than cars.  Perhaps, like with a bicycle, the riders are more friendly because they are more vulnerable and involved in the world.  Maybe it has a lot to do with the fact that nobody is in a hurry to do anything. 

I feel safe on streets like that.  Throw in a cow; it's ok. 

No traffic is that calm in my hometown.  There are spots of calm traffic in St. Louis, but the calm is never constant.  I could always jaywalk freely in the Loop and across one-way streets like Chestnut, but not at all hours.

St. Louisans are nice, but drivers rarely smile at me.  In Vietnam, I was very feverish, but I do remember people smiling at me everywhere I went.

I read something a while back about traffic lights in London being turned off to test traffic flow.  The researchers found that when rules were lacking people drove cautiously and yielded to everyone.  People got where they were going faster and accidents were cut in half.  I can't find the article again, but it is interesting.  Perhaps chaos can be a good thing under the right conditions.

Now in more developed countries, bikers need laws.  Korean bikers, as 30 mph bullets in body armor shooting down the sidewalks, are a danger to everyone and themselves.


Sunday, November 29, 2009

St. Louis Lid / Seattle's Freeway Park

Coming up from Portland into the state of Washington along Interstate 5, one first enters the city of Vancouver.  There's an interesting project there with a proposed lid covering a section of the highway.  To learn more about it and the proposed lid in St. Louis, read St. Louis Lid / Lid in Vancouver, Washington.

If you continue heading north along I-5, you'll eventually reach Seattle.  Seattle already built its lid.  The 5-acre Freeway Park was completed in 1976.  It is heavily wooded and its users have little indication that they are over a freeway at all. 


The space is a proper park, silent and away from the bustling city while being in the heart of it.  Whereas St. Louis and Vancouver, Washington are trying to connect their city to a park, Seattle has connected two parts of its city with a park.


It should be clear from these images why people from the Midwest always seem to be moving to the Northwest.  Freeway Park is beautiful. 

A lid like this would not be appropriate for downtown St. Louis.  If it magically got moved to St. Louis, I'd put it over I-64 south of Forest Park.  Perhaps an extention of Forest Park into the Hi-Pointe neighborhood better connecting Dogtown to Skinker and the park. Elevated above the Hi-Pointe, the park would offer an amazing view of downtown and the park.


It is important to point out that beautiful though the park is, it is a little secluded.  Freeway Park might benefit from a couple cafes or restaurants.  Given the amount of concrete and the weight of the soil and trees, it must be enormously expensive to maintain over time.

----------


this post relates to the Arch Grounds, highways, and the Gateway Mall.

The St. Louis Lid / The Lid in Vancouver, Washington

This is a two part blog.  After reading this, see St. Louis Lid / Seattle's Freeway Park.
----------

Does this look familiar?

This is Vancouver, Washington.  It's just north of Portland, Oregon.

I think it looks a bit similar to this,


There's a downtown, a big historic park, and a highway cloverleaf.

In Vancouver, Fort Vancouver National Historic Site is on the other side of a highway cloverleaf from its downtown.  The city can only access the park north of the cloverleaf.
In St. Louis, we have four interstates converging on a single bridge.  I-55, I-70, and I-64 all cross the Poplar Street Bridge.


Our interchange is also an obstacle.  It is safe to say that the Arch Grounds are difficult to approach from the south.


The national park in St. Louis must also be approached from further up the highway.  In our case, I-70 is the issue.


There is however a possibility of I-70 getting its own bridge north of the arch. 


When this is done, the section of I-70 that runs through downtown will be renamed as part of I-44.  There are those who are calling for the removal of that section of highway when that happens.

For as far back as I remember though, we've been talking about a lid over I-70 to connect the arch grounds to the Gateway Mall.


The lid would be replacing this,


with overpasses that look more like this,


HoK suggests widening the overpasses and making tree protected, landscaped walkways. 

Back to Vancouver.  The Columbia River Crossing from Portland, Oregon into the state of Washington is a massive highway project.  It too is contingent upon a giant new bridge.  It will also include a highway lid over I-5 at Evergreen Blvd. 


Like downtown St. Louis, this overpass also has a very wide road cutting off pedestrian access.  There is a stop sign there, though it is hard to see in this image.  I'm sure many rolling stops take place there.  The overpass itself is considerably more pedestrian friendly.  The sidewalk is wider and there are some cheap planters there to protect pedestrians from the fast moving traffic.  Still, this overpass is pretty horrible.  It connects Vancouver's downtown to their big park and historic site, Fort Vancouver

Like St. Louis, Vancouver has a plan for a lid.


There's a big open spot to still show off the highway infrastructure and include drivers in the space,


There's an effort to make it into a multi-level park that's an attraction in itself.


The lid doesn't solve all their problems.  They'll still have a much bigger mess to the south,


Efforts are being made though to include all sorts of stakeholders in the process.  Portland's planners have a hand it in.  It is very probable that this highway will be for bikes too,


----------
this post relates to the Arch Grounds, highways, and the Gateway Mall.

Wednesday, November 25, 2009

The King of Beers / Probably the Best Beer in the World


I was reading a book on the history of chemistry and the work of Niels Bohr when I came across the most incredible reference.  It seems this man who had such an incredible effect upon the modern world did his work in a place called the Institute for Theoretical Physics of the University of Copenhagen.  This institute was created by Bohr in 1921 with money donated by the Carlsberg Foundation.   Now, I read this in Singapore, which is a country whose beer market is dominated by Tiger and Carlsberg above all others.


Realizing that I often bought products from a beer company whose charity has a place in history, I checked out their website.   To my great surprise, I learned that the Carlsberg Group does not dump money into their foundation to ease their tax burden.  Nor does the foundation operate as a non-profit marketing tool for the company.  In Denmark, things are on their head.

The founder of the Carlsberg Brewery created his foundation in 1876.  Then, not wanting his son to run his brewery, he died in 1887 willing the ownership of the Carlsberg Group to the Carlsberg Foundation. 

From 1902 to now, the Carlsberg Foundation has had 51% control of the Carlsberg Group.  In this way, the charity owns the company.  When we buy beer from them, we give our money to the company and they pass the profits on to their shareholders and to their owner.  For this reason the following statements can be made.

1.  Every beer we buy funds science, art, and historic preservation in Copenhagan.
2.  The Carlsberg Group will never be bought by another company.
3.  The Carlsberg Group will never leave Copenhagan.

Now, as I learned this about Carlsberg, they were moving up in rank from the 5th biggest beer company in the world to the 4th.  A company ahead of them was at that time in the process of disappearing.


In this picture we see the Busch Stadium we grew up with being removed and replaced by a Wrigley Field imitation.  Wrigley Field being the home of our most hated rival, the Chicago Cubs.  Let's go to the beginning.

1876 is the year the Carlsberg Foundation was created.  It is also the year St. Louis City left St. Louis County.  The USA was 100 years old!  Adolphus Busch and his friend Carl Conrad made a new beer and he called it Budweiser. 

In 1953, Anheuser Busch purchased the St. Louis Cardinals.  In the 1960s, they built the old Busch Stadium for them, and by the 1990s the King of Beers ruled over happy St. Louisans who loved their beer and their baseball.

The Busch dynasty ruled St. Louis for a hundred years and new princes defended the legacies of their fathers.  In 1996, things started to go differently.  The family sold the St. Louis Cardinals for $150 million to a private group of investors.  Those new owners went on to demand a new stadium from the city.  They threatened to move to the county or to Illinois if the city did not grant them the funds for a new stadium. 
(Timeline of events and money here with anti-Slay polemics)
The new stadium and accompanying Ballpark Village cost in excess of $600 million with quite a bit more than $150 million coming from the city of St. Louis.  The new stadium was also named Busch, but only until 2025.  Perhaps at that point it will get a new name.  If the Sears Tower can be renamed Willis tower, then nothing is sacred.

In the summer of 2008, the board of Anheuser-Busch agreed to sell themselves to the Belgian-Brazilian company InBev for $52 billion.  The shareholders and board members pocketed some of that money, and the new St. Louis based European company Anheuser Busch InBev began restructuring.

InBev didn't actually have $52 billion.  They borrowed it.  To pay back their debt, they began chopping up and selling off the Anheuser Busch empire.  These sales were not done to improve the company, these sales were to pay off the debts of their new owners.  Most visible, the Busch Entertainment Corporation which owns Busch Gardens and Sea World was relocated from St. Louis to Orlando and promptly sold off to a British equity firm.  We could also take note of the fact that there are a few fewer jobs and clydesdales around now.



Now, comparing Carlsberg to Anheuser-Busch is a little frustrating.  Maybe Carlsberg could be eaten by a bigger company.  Let's look at the current list of brewers by size,
1. AB InBev
2. SABMiller
3. Heineken
4. Carlsberg
5. Molson Coors

SABMiller and Molson Coors are moving towards each other with MillerCoors (based in nearby Chicago).  If the  3rd and 5th merged, Carlsberg would still be 4th.  When the top three merge into one ABISABMiHikenors, then will Carlsberg still being going it alone?  Hard to say really.

Is Carlsberg a loser for not merging like the others?   Will they lose marketshare over time?  Or will people feel more inclined to drink a beer with a stable name they can pronounce and recognize?


I think the fallout from the big AB InBev merger has been interesting.  With Pfizer shrinking in St. Louis, lost talent broke lose and added to our biotech start-up industry.  Laid-off AB workers know brewing, and St. Louis could always use more microbreweries.

The Anheuser-Busch Foundation, which does not own AB InBev, has been very active in the past couple years.  They've been building buildings at UMSL, SLU, Fontbonne, and elsewhere.   Money has been flowing out of them at a regular rate.  I'm not sure how much their foundation and charitable giving was affected by the activities of the past 15 years, but it does feel like there has been a noticable increase in giving since the merger.

Looking towards the next hundred years, what will I be drinking?

St. Louis Rams / Greenbay Packers

Titles
Rams: 3
Packers: 12

Founded
Rams:  1936
Packers:  1919

Team History
Rams:  Cleveland Rams (1936-1945), LA Rams (1946-1994), St. Louis Rams (1995-now)
Packers:   Green Bay (1919-now)

Team Future
Rams:  Constantly changing owners consistently renew threat to relocate team to another city.
Packers:  By design, it is impossible to move from Green Bay

Average Attendence at Home Games in 2009
Rams: 60,041
Packers: 70,825

Metro Population
Rams:  2,813,912
Packers:  226,778

Stadium Capacity
Rams: 66,965
Packers:  72,928


What's the difference?


Size doesn't matter, ownership and fanbase do.
The highest ranked team in the NFL is also the only team that is a non-profit.  How has it kept such a small market for so long?  If it gives up on Green Bay it gives up all its money.  Moreover, it is owned by the fans.  There are 111,967 stockholders.  None have more than 200,000 shares.  The residents of Green Bay own the Packers.

St. Louisans may go to see a game at the dome.  They aren't seeing their team though.  They're seeing the property of a cadre of weathy individuals.  Just recently those individuals abandoned the team.  There was an emergency and other rich people had to step up and hold the team in place before it floated away to another city.

If I might be so bold, there is a better way.

Sunday, November 22, 2009

St. Louis Arena / Lotte World

I have an incredible amount of nostalgia for the St. Louis Ambush.  I was a loyal fan, and they left me.  So did the St. Louis Storm.



All of my childhood memories of sporting events took place in stadia now destroyed.  Busch Stadium is now just a circular imprint on the ground.  The St. Louis Arena, the Checkerdome, was destroyed.



It really is sad too.  The St. Louis Arena (1929-1999) held a lot of St. Louis history.  It housed quite a few events over the years.  It also held quite a few sports teams.  In hockey, there were the Flyers, the Eagles, Braves, and of course the Blues.  In soccer, we had the Steamers, Storm, and Ambush.  Other than the SLU Bilikins and the Spirits of St. Louis, we had an NBA team: the Hawks,



Most of the teams that left us, like the now Atlanta Hawks, did so because the St. Louis Arena was falling apart due to deferred maintenance.



When it was time to tear it down, the opposition from locals was strong.  Generations of St. Louisans formed strong attachments there.  The city thought of it as a liability though and due to a non-compete agreement with the new Kiel Center did not allow it to be occupied.  Bob Cassilly, the artist behind the St. Louis City Museum, offered $200,000 for the arena, which the city refused.  It was demolished soon after.

I must ask, "What if Bob Cassilly had done something with the St. Louis Arena in 1999, and it wasn't destroyed?"  Judging by his work, I'd assume it would now be a very interesting space.  Perhaps he'd gut it and just use the shell for a completely different purpose.  While thinking of this, I realized how similar the St. Louis Arena is to another place I am familiar with.



Now, I'm certain Mr. Cassilly would have come up with something unique, perhaps pursuing his aquarium there.  I can't help but wonder though if perhaps we might have something like Lotte World.  Lotte World is an amusement park in Seoul, South Korea.  It is an incredible park for its use of space.  On my first visit, I was consistently amazed to discover yet more vastness to the structure.





In the main area, there is an ice rink and a mall of sorts.  On the ceiling there are moving 'hot air balloons.'  There is a rollar coaster, an underground river rafting adventure, a swinging ship, a jeep safari, and all sorts of things that simply shouldn't fit into such a confined space, but do.  There's also a monorail leading to the larger rides on the adjoining adventure island.




Lotte World is a major adventure park inside a major city.  It doesn't sprawl out like Six Flags.  It somehow manages to stay contained mostly inside a single building, very much like the St. Louis City Museum.  This crazy island next to the main building is somewhat like Monstro City.  Where it couldn't all be contained indoors, some spilled out,



Lotte World is going to double in size again soon too.  For the past decade or so, there have been plans for an expansion along with a super-tall skyscraper to hold all of the Lotte Group's offices.  The park will be a part of this.



It may seem unreasonable to compare a demolished sports arena to a foreign theme park, but why not?  Anything could have happened.  Bob Cassilly could have done anything.  There was certainly enough space.